2 important games today. Australia v Sth Africa (whose last one day match produced a remarkable 880 odd run last ball thriller) and Bangladesh vs Bermuda. Can't see Bermuda beating Bangladesh (although Canada beat them at the last world cup - they are a much better side now) so expect (mutely) wild celebrations (due to Bangladesh being under some kind of state curfew at the moment...but) as they should experience their biggest achievement as a full-member of the cricketing world.
Andrew Symonds has been named in the Australian team, replacing the unlucky Brad Hodge (whose 88 ball 123 couldn't save his place). Could be a big risk, but he has become a rather important player in the Australian team. Strangely I think this makes them rather unbalanced with Symonds / Watson / Hogg / Clarke and possibly Hussey giving them bowling options after Tait / McGrath and Bracken. I might have kept Hodge instead of Watson - as he hasn't shown much with the ball so far (hopefully he'll prove me wrong today)
Hayden just hit his 66th ball faced for 6 to break the record for the fastest ever 100. I must tell you I enjoyed that. Take that South Africa - Take that Phil Jacques!
Much is being made of Flintoff's apparent peppering of Vaughan in the nets the other day after it was rumoured Vaughan, his captain, was the man behind Flintoff's sacking as vice-captain. And the fines. That net session must've been excellent viewing
Yeah, I'll take a tenner on the South Africans, thanks. As I write, they're matching the Aussies and then some. Come on the Boks!
What with England v Israel in the footie, England v Kenya in the cricket, plus the clash of the Titans in St Kitts, I'm all of a fluster. You are reellee spoileeng ersss! Supposed to be off to Reading in an hour as well...
Yeah, though none of the bowlers have actually taken a wicket yet, have they? 175 now needed off 21 overs,9 wickets in hand. Smith back in the last over to score the winning runs?
Fat lady singing time here in Sth Africa v Australia. Tait & Hogg bowled really well and Hayden's century was awesome but for me the revelation was Michael Clarke's 91. He looked the goods today. Good chase by Smith and De Villiers and to be fair Aussies had some luck with the runout and Smith's cramp.
joel wrote: Anyone else think it's time for Strauss?
Richard or Johann?
No, seriously, they won't pick him as Joyce has scored a few runs and they won't drop Vaughan. This doesn't leave many vacancies in the batting line up and as Strauss doesn't bowl he's not going to take that Dalrymple role (another wasted experiment).
There are only 5 players in this England squad who were involved in the 2005 Ashes win. How different is the next England squad going to be as clearly the likes of Dalrymple are for the scrap heap and I can't see them keeping Nixon or lewis too long either.
Strauss may get a game when all is beyond hope in about 3 super 8s matches time.
Was thinking more of Strauss replacing Bell. Lord Brocket should be hungry by now.
Of course, the difference between England and the top teams is that we can't drop Vaughan (ave. for this WC = 24*) but Aus can drop BJ "123 off 89 balls" Hodge.
* edited to add: after games against Canada and Kenya, Vaughan's ave. has actually fallen
So we have a Super 8 series without Pakistan or India, the two most populous countries at the tournament. This would be something to marvel at, were it not that both teams' exits are surrounded by match-fixing speculation. Yes, there may be nothing in such rumours, but I would feel disingenuous if I started talking about it as if everything was all hunkydory. After the Pak v Ire result, the match-fixing angle was (sad to say) my very first thought. It also was after England beat India in the Mumbai test match a year ago, after that highly bizarre Indian collapse. Am I the only one who thinks like this? Is everyone else less cynical than I am? My feeling is that there in recent year there has been too much tiptoeing around the issue. The ICC have been scared to mention it, the press have been scared to mention it, and yet now after Woolmer's assassination people are coming out of the woodwork (M Vaughan, M Speed to name but two) and saying that yes cricket has a problem with corruption. Well why? And since when? And where? And whose responsibility is it to sort it out? For me, cricket can recover from the murder of a coach. It can recover from the negative publicity brought on by this. But I am doubful that it could ever recover, if those who love and follow the game become unable to take any result seriously because of nagging suspicions over fixing of the scores.
I recommend the very end of this Observer article for more information on exactly how the process is said to work. Enlightening, and depressing, stuff.
It's all very upsetting as Muppet says, but will be very difficult to stamp out. As that Observer article makes clear, the range of bets available make it possible for shenanigans to occur without the connivance of the whole team or even without necessarily affecting the outcome of the match. The length of matches and the fact that actions within matches can be hidden much more easily than they can in other sports (unless you're Hans Segers of course) make it easy prey for bookies and syndicates.
I think this goes on in all sports to a degree. William Hill offered a bet on whether Craig Bellamy would celebrate with a golfswing if he scored against Barcelona. He did and he did. OK, he has to score in the first place, but how ****ing daft is that? Tell your mates to put some money down and make sure you fulfil the bet if you can. It's different to saying 'get some money down, Dad, I fancy a hat-trick today'. Some of this stuff is wide open to abuse.
I'd like to see some of the anger of Indian and Pakistani fans directed against the bookies as well as the team. Or rather, that they demand that their players resist temptation and play straight -- and then accept that if they do, they will sometimes lose fair and square and that's the glory of sport.
It seems to me that one thing globalisation has done has flattened the world of sport. Meaning that cricketers on the subcontinent wonder why they're earning 30 grand a year and Flintoff and co. are earning ten times that before endorsements. That comparison would never have occurred even ten years ago. It's a global market for sport these days, everyone wants a piece of the pie because they see clearly how much money is floating around. Player power is the power of celebrity, in the sub-continent, in the UK, almost everywhere. And celebrity is about having more money than other people. It ****ing stinks. You just have to hope that, sooner or later, pride in being a player for your county, your railway company or your country comes back into fashion again.
El Presidente wrote: Anyone else suffering from a world cup withdrawl with no game on today?
Can't wait for the Australia v West Indies match tomorrow.
I'm glad of the break. At least I'm not at work feeling guilty because there's something more worthwhile I should be doing ...
WI v Aus should be a cracker. I fancy WI for that one, Bravo to hit a ton.
I've got a tenner on that, in conjunction with a streaker called Jonathan running onto the pitch in the 7th over and McGrath bowling two wides in the first powerplay...
joel wrote: I've got a tenner on that, in conjunction with a streaker called Jonathan running onto the pitch in the 7th over and McGrath bowling two wides in the first powerplay...
However, I'd be careful sticking tenners on round here willy-nilly as Muppet proved with this hasty call halfway through the Sth Africa innings vs Australia.
Muppet wrote:
Yeah, I'll take a tenner on the South Africans, thanks. As I write, they're matching the Aussies and then some. Come on the Boks!
Don't know where this goes, so I'll put it in here. It's from quite a cute Frank Keating article in The Guardian:
Last word (or, rather, first) on an English cricketer getting "Freddied" in the Caribbean. From the journal of Legh Barratt, a young Norfolk all-rounder, on the first England tour there:
"February 1, 1895. Barbados: The greatest difficulty I have at present is evading drinks which are continually being forced down me. I have been introduced to so many, mostly after the nature of c ocktails. I never laughed more or enjoyed a day so much. Batted. Made 0. Couldn't see. Got awful smack on heart from a bumpy ball."
joel wrote: "February 1, 1895. Barbados: The greatest difficulty I have at present is evading drinks which are continually being forced down me. I have been introduced to so many, mostly after the nature of c ocktails. I never laughed more or enjoyed a day so much. Batted. Made 0. Couldn't see. Got awful smack on heart from a bumpy ball."
Hmm. Suddenly reincarnation seems possible...
-- Edited by paichukka at 13:56, 2007-03-27
__________________
"Much Urdu about nothing" (Vic Marks describing Inzie's press conferences)
joel wrote: "February 1, 1895. Barbados: The greatest difficulty I have at present is evading drinks which are continually being forced down me. I have been introduced to so many, mostly after the nature of c ocktails. I never laughed more or enjoyed a day so much. Batted. Made 0. Couldn't see. Got awful smack on heart from a bumpy ball."
Hmm. Suddenly reincarnation seems possible...
-- Edited by paichukka at 13:56, 2007-03-27
Indeed. You are right.
June 12th, 1999. Vienna: The greatest difficulty I have at present is evading drinks which are continually being forced down me. I have been introduced to so many, mostly after the nature of c ocktails. I never laughed more or enjoyed a day so much. Batted. Made 0. Couldn't see. Got awful smack on inner thigh from a ball which reared from a good length."
Remarkable ! (Edited due to Joel using the word uncanny at an uncannily similar time)
June 12th, 1999. Vienna: The greatest difficulty I have at present is evading drinks which are continually being forced down me. I have been introduced to so many, mostly after the nature of c ocktails. I never laughed more or enjoyed a day so much. Batted. Made 0. Couldn't see. Got awful smack on inner thigh from a ball which reared from a good length."
Lots of laughs today, I'm biggrinning like an inbred loon.
An 'Invent a Tour Diary' thread to go with the 'Invent a Cricketer' thread?
What do you think? Does a few grainy YouTube clips actually financially hurt the ICC? I seriously doubt it. Losing advertising revenue from India and Pakistan's early exit would have to hurt more than us watching a clip of a Bangladeshi hitting an Indian bowler for 6.
The ICC should be coming out of the World Cup smelling like roses. If you ask me, they'll end up smelling like the roses prize fertilizer instead. Tightwads and funkilling numpties.
What do you think? Does a few grainy YouTube clips actually financially hurt the ICC? I seriously doubt it. Losing advertising revenue from India and Pakistan's early exit would have to hurt more than us watching a clip of a Bangladeshi hitting an Indian bowler for 6.
The ICC should be coming out of the World Cup smelling like roses. If you ask me, they'll end up smelling like the roses prize fertilizer instead. Tightwads and funkilling numpties.
Agree. I noticed that the clips linked to from The Guardian had been taken down.
So many officials and flunkeys, you've got to give some of them something to do...
Don't know if it was the same article but I read a comment from a TV exec who said if a clip of a popular show was on youtube he'd pull it, but if it were a less successful one he'd leave it up.
The rights owners need to think about whether these clips are actually promoting the tournament and the game ...
Clarke's just gone... I'd love it if the Windies won this tournament.
Meanwhile Paichie, being in Barcelona and all are you off to see the Andorra match tomorrow?
__________________
You will play better Today than you did Yesterday, and almost as much as you will Tomorrow
Bunch of us here (Toon Army, Catalunya section) had tickets lined up. But given recent results we are all totally disillusioned with kickball (bunch of glory hunters you see), and none of us wanted to go in the end. It's not tomato season, so no after-match entertainment...
Footballers. Fuggem.
Lanka or Kiwis for the cup. To beat the Aussies you've got to take wickets. Step forward Messrs Malinga, Vaas, Murali and Bond...
__________________
"Much Urdu about nothing" (Vic Marks describing Inzie's press conferences)
paichukka wrote: Bunch of us here (Toon Army, Catalunya section) had tickets lined up. But given recent results we are all totally disillusioned with kickball (bunch of glory hunters you see), and none of us wanted to go in the end. It's not tomato season, so no after-match entertainment...
Footballers. Fuggem.
****, watching England live doesn't even count as a potentially interesting night out win or lose, does it? I hope Andorra stuff 'em.
It's painful to say it but England need to miss out on Euro 2008, then maybe they'll get it.
****, watching England live doesn't even count as a potentially interesting night out win or lose, does it? I hope Andorra stuff 'em.
It's painful to say it but England need to miss out on Euro 2008, then maybe they'll get it.
Any members of the "Maclaren to stay" club on these here boards? I think he should go, just for his hair, meself. Oh and his ****ty results too. Worse than Robson and Taylor believe it or not.
Any members of the "Maclaren to stay" club on these here boards? I think he should go, just for his hair, meself. Oh and his ****ty results too. Worse than Robson and Taylor believe it or not.
Robson had his sticky periods -- who can forget Euro 88? -- but his teams by and large had a modicum of skill and a great deal of spirit. Look at clips of his England teams and at almost any point see how much better they were at keeping possession. Could have done with two centre backs that weren't Watson and Butcher though. Robson's a football man and a tactician, McLaren is neither, he just fell into coaching.
So, your 7am class tomorrow gets cancelled so you can stay up late, drink beer and watch cricket on your 21st century technology Canadian Asian Television Cricket televison channel, and you rush home as fast as possible to watch the 2nd half of the match. Then it rains. ****
So much for the sunkissed Caribbean - it rains more than Manchester if this World Cup's anything to go on...
Wonder why they had it March if it always pisses it down. Just to avoid the hurricane season I suppose.
As for McClaren he can always look at a game and see where things went wrong but he can't actually do anything to improve or change things. He's a fitness coach and analyst - he's good on "breaking things down" but not at putting anything together.
Apparently the miserable bunch of spoilt ****s called Team England are all taking the piss out of him after he tried to bollock them following the Israel match. Whether or not that's true, they don't respect him.
He should break Phil Neville's leg to prove he's for real. With his bare hands. Or something
__________________
You will play better Today than you did Yesterday, and almost as much as you will Tomorrow
Golcar CC wrote:Am I the only person who didn't know Tony Cozier was white?
I used to assume he was black after only hearing him on the radio, but then an amused friend of mine corrected me. This was about 10 years ago though. White Jamaicans can produce wide-eyed reactions in people - I saw a stand-up comedian play brilliantly on it once. He came on stage, talked for 2-3 minutes so people heard his accent, then he said "By the way, I'm from Jamaica. [pause, smile] Yes. [pause] I know." And he had us. Really funny guy actually, wish I could remember his name.
So, when will the Windies produce their "white Ntini"...?
I'll risk a "virtual fiver" on the Sirils. I like their bowling attack, good variety and the Sth Africans might put some extra pressure on themselves. I'm waiting for Malinga the Slinger to stamp his authority on a game. Tait is taking wickets, Malinga should be as well. This is actually quite a big game as the Aussies are starting to look quite methodical. This is a game that will hurt the loser a lot in the bigger picture. I hope we get a good contest.