This is a fantastic little test: You have to spot the bluffer from two people talking about War & Peace. Not obvious at all! Answer not revealed till tomorrow (Friday). The voting so far is almost exactly neck and neck.
I voted A was the bluffer because he used the word "juxtaposition" - B is telling the truth becuase he said "****-up" - that's my 2 cents (or 4.8 tolars) worth anyway.
Life is too short to try and read War and Peace anyway.
Muppet wrote: This is a fantastic little test: You have to spot the bluffer from two people talking about War & Peace. Not obvious at all! Answer not revealed till tomorrow (Friday). The voting so far is almost exactly neck and neck.
I find it rather ironic that an article which champions not needing to read lengthy text is written in 1,700 words, or 7 mins at 250 words per minute, quite some length for a news website...
Having not the time to read it all, I went for B, as right at the begining he does not challange "A"'s use of Pierre. Presumably the bluffer, if going to be a real bluffer and not having read the book/seen the film etc..., has no idea who the central character is.
I reckon the writer is actually bluffing that he's a decent journalist....
The results are out and it seems that "A" was the bluffer. I suspected as much due to the overuse of long words. So the moral of the story seems to be , to talk bollocks, one should use long confusing words to sound like you are an expert.
i have actually read War and peace just recently, and I can say that the bluffer had a pretty good stab at pulling it off. He gave himself away as ther was no love triangle between the brother and sister, however the booker guy didn't seem to pick this up either. He must at least have read an edited version or seen the movie, more likely. No way he can know all that **** without either or!!
El Presidente wrote: The results are out and it seems that "A" was the bluffer. I suspected as much due to the overuse of long words. So the moral of the story seems to be , to talk bollocks, one should use long confusing words to sound like you are an expert.
Sir Humphrey: "Prime Minister, I must protest in the strongest possible terms my profound opposition to a newly instituted practice which imposes severe and intolerable restrictions upon the ingress and egress of senior members of the hierarchy and which will, in all probability, should the current deplorable innovation be perpetuated, precipitate a constriction of the channels of communication, and culminate in a condition of organisational atrophy and administrative paralysis which will render effectively impossible the coherent and co-ordinated discharge of the functions of government within Her Majesty's United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland." Jim Hacker: "You mean you've lost your key?"
Jim Hacker: "I'm happy to tell you that you've been cleared of spying." Sir Humphrey: "How?" Jim Hacker: "Something Sir John Halstead wrote." Sir Humphrey: "Oh, that is very gratifying." Jim Hacker: "Yes indeed, I knew you would be pleased." Sir Humphrey: "May one see the document?" Jim Hacker: "One certainly may. Better still, one can have it read to one: May 28 - Another session with that prize goof Appleby. Fooled him completely." Sir Humphrey: "Yes I see, well thank you, Prime Minister." Jim Hacker: "No, no, no, goes on Humphrey, clears you even more. Never asked any of the difficult questions. Didn't seem to have read the MI5 file..." Sir Humphrey: "Yes that is quite clear, thank you very much." Jim Hacker: "...So much wool in his head, it is child's play to pull it over his eyes. Isn't that wonderful! You must be a very happy man."
During the establishment of formal pigeon post services, the registration of all birds was introduced. At the same time, in order to hinder the efficiency of the systems of foreign countries, difficulties were placed in the way of the importation of their birds for training, and in a few cases falcons were specially trained to interrupt the service war-time, the Germans having set the example by employing hawks against the Paris pigeons in 1870-71. No satisfactory method of protecting the weaker birds seems to have been developed, though the Chinese formerly provided their pigeons with whistles and bells to scare away birds of prey. However, as radio telegraphy and telephony were developed, the use of pigeons became limited to fortress warfare as early as in the 1910's. As an example, the British Admiralty discontinued its pigeon service in the early 20th century, although it had attained a remarkably high standard of efficiency. Nevertheless, large numbers of birds were still kept at the great inland fortresses of France, Germany and Russia at the outbreak of the First World War.
__________________
You will play better Today than you did Yesterday, and almost as much as you will Tomorrow
After reading the above piece on pigeons I thought I would be sleeping well tonight, until I remembered the existence of this clip, which will probably keep me awake all night.
* "I would die like that, playing that type of football, rather than compromise our principles. There are no questions about that, no questions" - Thierry Henry realises Arsenal are out of the title race at the end of October.
* "The worst thing about playing Chelsea is having to listen to Mourinho afterwards. He talks absolute bollocks. He should shut the f**k up" - Barcelona's Edmilson.
* "Places like this are the soul of English football. The crowd is magnificent, singing 'F**k off Mourinho' and so on" - Mourinho takes his first trip to Bramall Lane.
__________________
You will play better Today than you did Yesterday, and almost as much as you will Tomorrow