I thought I'd start to compile a list of reasons why the forthcoming Cricket World Cup is far superior to its footballing equivalent. I do reckon it shouldn't be too difficult. After all, unless you're Italian, last year's fußball tournament was pretty dismal, at least once the group stages were over.
Plenty of inspiration available then, so here goes:
1) No Sepp Blatter. 2) No expert analysis by anyone named Lineker, Lawrenson, Wright or Milovanović. 3) Match officials who know their arse from their elbow. 4) Not a Brazilian or an Argentine in sight. Or, more to the point, a Frenchman. 5) England have a small, but genuine, chance of winning. 6) Scotland have actually qualified for this one. 7) So have Ireland. 8) No idiots sellotaping England flags to their car windows. 9) And then leaving them there for 3 months after the tournament ends. 10) Kingston, Georgetown and Bridgetown instead of Kaiserslautern, Gelsenkirchen and Baden Baden. 11) England fans behaving themselves (admittedly this is relative). 12) Decent weather guaranteed. 13) No "Thine Be The Glory". 14) Monty diving to save 4, not C Ronaldo diving to save his bacon. 15) Geoffrey Boycott. 16) The Spirit Of The Game®. 17) Has-been singers won't be clogging up the charts with shameless World Cup cash-in songs. 18) The players will get more column inches than their wives & girlfriends. 19) Fair chance that no-one will headbutt an opponent over a childish comment about his sister (unless Graeme Smith takes a catch to dismiss KP). 20) Tony Blair will not do a World Cup phone-in on Radio 5Live.
I hope to come up with more. Feel free to add your own...
Could it be the thought of being given a lecture on the difference between poor, middling and essential Shirley Bassey recordings by an enthusiatic mr Chukka that is doing it?
1. Italy can't win it. 2. Scotland get there, but don't get out of the group. 3. It could be our year. 4. It's not all over after just 5 weeks (er, that's good yeah?)
__________________
You will play better Today than you did Yesterday, and almost as much as you will Tomorrow
Golcar CC wrote:2. Scotland get there, but don't get out of the group.
Hmmm... I think you might struggle to find a tournament in any sport to which that doesn't apply.
28) England will not lose a penalty shoot-out. 29) The shops will not be full of useless tatty merchandise. 30) No well-known chocolate bars are planning to change their name for the duration of the tournament. 31) The Germans can't win it.
Muppet wrote:30) No well-known chocolate bars are planning to change their name for the duration of the tournament. Can someone please enlighten me? This is the first I have heard of this practice.
Mars changed its name to "Believe" in Britain last summer:
Muppet wrote:30) No well-known chocolate bars are planning to change their name for the duration of the tournament. Can someone please enlighten me? This is the first I have heard of this practice.
Mars changed its name to "Believe" in Britain last summer:
Wow. I hadn't actually heard that. You are kidding of course, aren't you?
What possible reason did they have for that idiocy?
Muppet wrote: Not kidding, I'm afraid. Here's some more evidence for you. The Scots were apparently happy to keep deep-frying them though...
What were they called in Scotland - "Better luck next time"
I'd be impressed if Snickers really tried to capture the mood of the nation and became "McClaren Out" for the next few months. (Or "Come On, You Israel")
__________________
You will play better Today than you did Yesterday, and almost as much as you will Tomorrow
Golcar CC wrote: What were they called in Scotland - "Better luck next time"
Apparently it was only reasons of space that prevented this. And from changing the Welsh one to "You didn't seriously think you were going to make it, did you?"