Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Reasons why the Cricket World Cup is better than the Football World Cup


Je suis l'état et l'état c'est moi

Status: Offline
Posts: 188
Date:
Reasons why the Cricket World Cup is better than the Football World Cup
Permalink   


I thought I'd start to compile a list of reasons why the forthcoming Cricket World Cup is far superior to its footballing equivalent. I do reckon it shouldn't be too difficult. After all, unless you're Italian, last year's fußball tournament was pretty dismal, at least once the group stages were over.

Plenty of inspiration available then, so here goes:

1) No Sepp Blatter.
2) No expert analysis by anyone named Lineker, Lawrenson, Wright or Milovanović.
3) Match officials who know their arse from their elbow.
4) Not a Brazilian or an Argentine in sight. Or, more to the point, a Frenchman.
5) England have a small, but genuine, chance of winning.
6) Scotland have actually qualified for this one.
7) So have Ireland.
8) No idiots sellotaping England flags to their car windows.
9) And then leaving them there for 3 months after the tournament ends.
10) Kingston, Georgetown and Bridgetown instead of Kaiserslautern, Gelsenkirchen and Baden Baden.
11) England fans behaving themselves (admittedly this is relative).
12) Decent weather guaranteed.
13) No "Thine Be The Glory".
14) Monty diving to save 4, not C Ronaldo diving to save his bacon.
15) Geoffrey Boycott.
16) The Spirit Of The Game®.
17) Has-been singers won't be clogging up the charts with shameless World Cup cash-in songs.
18) The players will get more column inches than their wives & girlfriends.
19) Fair chance that no-one will headbutt an opponent over a childish comment about his sister (unless Graeme Smith takes a catch to dismiss KP).
20) Tony Blair will not do a World Cup phone-in on Radio 5Live.

I hope to come up with more. Feel free to add your own...

__________________


Disco Brad

Status: Offline
Posts: 888
Date:
Permalink   

Muppet wrote:


17) Has-been singers won't be clogging up the charts with shameless World Cup cash-in songs.



erm coming from the land that gave us this  I wouldn't make too many rash statements.

 

I'll add three more

21) - Because you can't have a boring 0-0 draw

22) Because Australia can't be robbed by diving Italians after outplaying them

23) Because Australia win it quite often



__________________
Slogger 
a batsman who hits a lot of slogs. Derogatory.


Bezalgo

Status: Offline
Posts: 366
Date:
Permalink   

El Presidente wrote:

Muppet wrote:


17) Has-been singers won't be clogging up the charts with shameless World Cup cash-in songs.



erm coming from the land that gave us this I wouldn't make too many rash statements.

 

that is very poor.

Why is there a general view among rugby/cricket/MOR/establishment types that ponderous = added meaning...

nowhere near as the attempt to give even deeper "meaning" to Swing Low Sweet Chariot by UB40



__________________
You will play better Today than you did Yesterday, and almost as much as you will Tomorrow


Heading for toffee

Status: Offline
Posts: 84
Date:
Permalink   

England were ok but there was something very Shirley Bassey about that woman's voice. Where's Paichukka - our S. Bassey expert?

__________________
Normal for Shropshire


Disco Brad

Status: Offline
Posts: 888
Date:
Permalink   

Luxury wrote:

England were ok but there was something very Shirley Bassey about that woman's voice. Where's Paichukka - our S. Bassey expert?

I can't quite put my finger on why,
but there is something about that post that has me slightly concerned.

 



__________________
Slogger 
a batsman who hits a lot of slogs. Derogatory.


Heading for toffee

Status: Offline
Posts: 84
Date:
Permalink   

Try.



__________________
Normal for Shropshire


Disco Brad

Status: Offline
Posts: 888
Date:
Permalink   

Luxury wrote:

Try.




 Could it be the thought of being given a lecture on the difference between poor, middling and essential Shirley Bassey recordings by an enthusiatic mr Chukka that is doing it?



__________________
Slogger 
a batsman who hits a lot of slogs. Derogatory.


Heading for toffee

Status: Offline
Posts: 84
Date:
Permalink   

I gather his expertise extends only to knowing exactly how long into a Bassey recording it is socially acceptable to begin vomiting.

__________________
Normal for Shropshire


Bezalgo

Status: Offline
Posts: 366
Date:
Permalink   



1. Italy can't win it.
2. Scotland get there, but don't get out of the group.
3. It could be our year.
4. It's not all over after just 5 weeks (er, that's good yeah?)


__________________
You will play better Today than you did Yesterday, and almost as much as you will Tomorrow


Je suis l'état et l'état c'est moi

Status: Offline
Posts: 188
Date:
Permalink   

Golcar CC wrote:
2. Scotland get there, but don't get out of the group.

Hmmm... I think you might struggle to find a tournament in any sport to which that doesn't apply.

28) England will not lose a penalty shoot-out.
29) The shops will not be full of useless tatty merchandise.
30) No well-known chocolate bars are planning to change their name for the duration of the tournament.
31) The Germans can't win it.

-- Edited by Muppet at 13:26, 2007-02-16

__________________


Disco Brad

Status: Offline
Posts: 888
Date:
Permalink   

Muppet wrote:



30) No well-known chocolate bars are planning to change their name for the duration of the tournament.





 Can someone please enlighten me? This is the first I have heard of this practice.



__________________
Slogger 
a batsman who hits a lot of slogs. Derogatory.


Je suis l'état et l'état c'est moi

Status: Offline
Posts: 188
Date:
Permalink   

El Presidente wrote:

Muppet wrote:
30) No well-known chocolate bars are planning to change their name for the duration of the tournament.

Can someone please enlighten me? This is the first I have heard of this practice.

Mars changed its name to "Believe" in Britain last summer:


Attachments
__________________


Disco Brad

Status: Offline
Posts: 888
Date:
Permalink   

Muppet wrote:

El Presidente wrote:

Muppet wrote:
30) No well-known chocolate bars are planning to change their name for the duration of the tournament.

Can someone please enlighten me? This is the first I have heard of this practice.

Mars changed its name to "Believe" in Britain last summer:



 Wow. I hadn't actually heard that. You are kidding of course, aren't you?

What possible reason did they have for that idiocy?



__________________
Slogger 
a batsman who hits a lot of slogs. Derogatory.


Je suis l'état et l'état c'est moi

Status: Offline
Posts: 188
Date:
Permalink   

Not kidding, I'm afraid. Here's some more evidence for you.
The Scots were apparently happy to keep deep-frying them though...

__________________


Bezalgo

Status: Offline
Posts: 366
Date:
Permalink   

Muppet wrote:
Not kidding, I'm afraid. Here's some more evidence for you.
The Scots were apparently happy to keep deep-frying them though...

 What were they called in Scotland - "Better luck next time"


I'd be impressed if Snickers really tried to capture the mood of the nation and became "McClaren Out" for the next few months. (Or "Come On, You Israel")



__________________
You will play better Today than you did Yesterday, and almost as much as you will Tomorrow


Je suis l'état et l'état c'est moi

Status: Offline
Posts: 188
Date:
Permalink   

Golcar CC wrote:
What were they called in Scotland - "Better luck next time"


Apparently it was only reasons of space that prevented this. And from changing the Welsh one to "You didn't seriously think you were going to make it, did you?"



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard